Big Society

July 30th, 2010 by putt1ck

The words of the moment. But an old idea, something some people have been practising all their lives, a concept that is as old as thought. Giving is indeed better than receiving. And the best “gifts” in the Big Society concept is those that just keep on giving. The volunteers that pick up the litter on the local fields are great as are is outcome of having litter-free green areas; but when they stop doing it, whether through age, illness or they move away, the fields stop being litter-free.

Open source project contributions on the other hand just keep on giving: we add a fix, everyone benefits from the fix; you add an enhancement, everyone gets the enhancement; they add some documentation, everyone gets to use the documentation. Ain’t that great? So, all you councils, voluntary organisations, government departments and agencies, join in…

Risky software acquisition

June 24th, 2010 by putt1ck

I learnt recently of the incredible power procurement officers in government have over purchases, even over purchases well outside their area of expertise. In many ways it explained the slow movement of the public sector towards open source, despite all open source software’s obvious benefits for and alignment with the public sector. It also helps to explain the incredible amount of money that has been wasted by the public sector in IT projects.

In particular I think the risk models for software are different and purchasing officers need to be aware of those differences; contrary to other acquisitions they would have experience of, software acquisition risk is not reduced inline with the financial strength of the software’s supplier or manufacturer, but with its openness.

The more open a piece of software, the lower the risk. This is not just about whether or not the source is open, it includes other measures. For example the openness of the development tools and frameworks and libraries utilised in making the software, the degree to which the documentation is open, whether or not the software conforms to relevant open standards and the degree to which the deployment is open.

So the lowest possible risk is a piece of software whose source is open, whose development tools, frameworks and libraries are open, whose documentation is open, which utilises open standards and has no restrictions on deployment numbers.

The highest risk comes with software whose source is closed (cannot be modified, supported or fixed by others), which is based on closed development tools, frameworks and libraries (so your choice of where and how to deploy the software is controlled by others), whose documentation is closed (and thus you cannot choose to correct it and or tailor it to your needs), which does not utilise open standards (thus making it incredibly hard to move away from and limiting what other applications you use with it) and which restricts the deployment (how many machines/users can utilise it is something you have to manage or risk prosecution).

Once you understand the model of risk with software, it is easy to see that the traditional model being applied tended to result in very closed software being selected, as it is exactly those attributes being closed that tend to result in high prices for the software and support being chargeable. It also makes for a simple explanation of all that public sector expenditure…

Adding value to your organisation through technology choices - for free!

January 26th, 2010 by putt1ck

[The following is a rework of a post I wrote regarding adding value to charities on my corporate blog (over here), but it was a while ago and the basic principles seem highly applicable to the public sector, so here goes...]

A lot has been written in recent years regarding the importance of ICT (IS, IT, technical; pick your collective term of choice) staff having an understanding of the organisation in which they work and therefore being able to add real value to the organisation through their selection and application of technology. Companies the world around have taken heed of this, particularly after noting the positive results generated for the trailblazers, and have explored ways of getting their ICT staff aligned with the organisation (instead of treating them as outsiders). Many specialist sectors tend to be a little behind in these trends, and it seemed that possibly this message was taking its time getting through to the public sector in the UK or, at least, not in a way that is apparent to me (honourable exceptions noted!).

So for the benefit of the public good (sic [1]), here’s my take on the how and the why.

First a brief history. Traditionally IT support (note not I “C” T then, as phones were commonly under operations or buildings and email was strictly for geeks) was a very specialised task, maintaining complex and fragile technology for the benefit of another, better embedded (although similarly misunderstood, they tell me ;)), group of specialists: the finance team. As computing technology became more mainstream the function naturally continued to report to finance, with whom, it turned out, they had little in common. Other than similarly esoteric sets of knowledge and language. And an ability to strike fear into those who work in other functions…

As a result of reporting to an upstream function that had no real interest in IT challenges and opportunities, IT staff became quite isolated from the rest of the organisation. The situation was then exacerbated by the rapid move to pervasive computing, leaving many non-IT people a little confused and resentful of this technology being pushed upon them and by proxy resentful of those geeky types who understood it; this was magnified by said geeky types’ need to associate with large, noisy yet sensitive machinery and therefore away from everyone else: cue The IT Crowd.

The end result was an entire generation of IT staff who didn’t (appear) to “understand the business” because the rest of the company basically ignored them. Or outsourced them. And then email and the web rose in importance as a way for organisations to communicate both internally and externally, then along came VOIP (telephony over the computer network). IT became ICT. The corporate communications solutions are scary things to put in the hands of people you don’t actually communicate with…

So to some thoughts on resolving that aspect of the current situation. First, all non-ICT staff note: actually, despite appearances, techie types are not just bright, they’re mostly pretty sociable. Indeed the ones you perceive as the quietest probably know and interact with more people from more countries, races and religions than you. It’s just they don’t know what these people look like, sound like, their real names, etc. because they communicate using technology such as online chat. And spend so much time communicating using online chat (commonly IRC, which considerably predates AIM, MSN and GChat) and email (around in its current form since the 1980s) that they have sometimes failed to develop face to face communication skills to the same degree. Nonetheless they communicate, and richly. Think on this: who do you think invented emoticons (smilies)? As in who saw the need to add emotional (social) content to text communication? Teenagers 5 or so years ago when they got mobile phones and instant messaging? No, geeks, a quarter of a century ago ;).

So act one is bringing ICT staff inside. Stop treating them as something that services “the business” and realise they are or should be an intrinsic part of the organisation. Accept that given the world is now heavily, for good or bad, dependent on technology and realise that your organisation stands to gain a lot from clever use of the same technology. Then realise that the people who are absolutely and utterly, without question, best placed to identify and implement new technologies that will be of benefit to the organisation are the people who actually have enough of an interest in technology (and the organisation) to know about new things long before the BBC and the teenagers. That would be the IT staff some of you out-sourced a few years ago…

Bringing technical staff inside means having representation of ICT at the most senior levels of the organisation. Not someone that ICT staff report to but does not have sufficient time in their day, nor in their previous careers, to actually appreciate or understand technology and what it could do to help, but someone whose job it is to think strategically about information and communication, and how technology could support and improve their processing and use for the organisation and its objectives. Someone who when talking to you does not have to worry about whether your laptop is working, just as the finance and admin director shouldn’t have to worry about whether or not your pencil is sharp.

Now on to how ICT staff in the public sector can add real value, for free. In fact not just for free but with a great big budget reduction to boot. I’m not just talking here about simple improved processes, nicer telephone systems or a slightly faster web application for planning information, although those as well.  But it can take some time for the best of us to identify technologies that will help in a given sector, let alone an individual organisation, but with public sector organisations there are a couple of neat starting points.

Most importantly think about this: all public sector organisations depend on a single aspect of culture; the willingness of people to give, to pool resources for the public good; and in case of quite a large number of people, to be prepared to work in public service. Regardless of what else a public sector organisation does, educate, feed, heal, house, coordinate, etc., it is essential to their success that the general populace has the desire and interest in having them there, to see sharing services and helping those less fortunate as something positive. Anything that promotes this sharing behaviour in our culture is a good thing for the public sector; the opposite is also the case.

This positive aspect of cultures and individuals is the same that allows open source software to thrive; people give of their time, their skills and/or their cash for the benefit of the greater good. So there is one simple thing that ICT staff in the public sector can do to add real value, to really help the public and themselves:

switch to using open source.

Switch to open source not because a given technical solution available at that instant of assessment and acquisition is “the best”. Not because the use of open source allows you to absolutely ensure the chosen solution becomes the best (once in use and the success criteria far better understood). Not even because the same technical people interested in open source are more likely to be interested in working in the public sector even if that means challenging working conditions and sometimes lower pay. Nor for the other long term cost savings offered by open source. Think, for a moment, about the tendency of the public sector to be helping the under-privileged and how open source solutions have no cost of purchase so your use is likely to facilitate (legal…) adoption by those very same under-privileged people and how one public sector body’s use of an open source application will tend to result in the improvement of that software for all the other users; let that influence the decision.

But in the final analysis, switch to open source because it promotes a sharing mentality in the greater society. The ultimate way to add value to the public sector through technology. Technically not simple, but philosophically so, and ancient philosophies at that. Cultivate the desire to share; giving begats giving; do unto others as you would be done by.

To promote your public sector organisation, act for the public good[1] in your choice of ICT…

[1] More on the public good in a later post…

Hello UKGovOSS world!

October 27th, 2009 by putt1ck

Not much more to say at the moment. Except why so few senior managers from government here?


glass117
lyric40
lyric83
fitness19
lyric100
lyric88
george71
hotel90
gibson96
fracture149
holidays239
hannahscupboard.com
maggie109
great187
destinationrewards.com
fiction199
images36
grand157
health134
family131
greshamarea.com
information115
hospital70
laptop38
fabric102
inmate124
green198
inurl201
laura60
hawaii119
fitness16
homes13
homes9
japanese46
flight31
firmware246
login237
indiana77
worldprivacyforum.org
gambar16
feelgoodcounseling.com
leather82
botmag.com
fender176
links175
gloves131
hockey219
flights34
lyrics248
lymph38
edcomp.com
french185
lyrics144
remax-midstates.com
forum120
noticiacristiana.com
heart142
industries94
flight31
estate4
infomation109
promdresses.com
hotel164
lyric70
rsdfoundation.org
guatemala9
express93
goldlinecontrols.com
lyrics46
madden90
inuyasha205
listing193
jessica86
lodge225
luxury37
italy249
jacket9
lights156
festival183
incorporated46
installation129
lyric68
machine74
example62
hotel106
house192
mirabilis.ca
madison92
tcdsb.org
kingston222
films219
hitachi214
greek193
floridasecrets.com
ingredients119
injection121
machines88
standardshift.com
grille221
leeson.com
express91
halloween82
honda17
hotel163
heater150
kelly185
lyrics182
hunter246
the-seeker.com
gratis182
lyric48
guitar39
japan43
laboratories3
cum-zilla.com
groups249
manual190
tennesseetrustee.com
lyric91
kubota248
george74
honey36
institute135
grade153
liquor187
marina229
bettegant.com
green198
sweethour.com
homes8
fanart146
dogs-names.net
leather84
francisco166
marketmaps.com
lyric66
jackson12
health126
julia144
games17
careersatlowes.com
marketing247
irons220
estate22
group228
india59
hotel87
lyric73
shore-guide.com
lyric82
login236
japan43
heaven158
group226
flash26
fedora166
frame152
exploit86
leisure97
rowadventures.com
france155
malaysia145
icons15
luggage33
island229
crimsontradition.com
fashion159
lyrics159
logic235
extra98
jewelry99
hydroponicvegetablegardening.com
hybrid5
island229
games19
viewernetwork.net
james31
luggage33
infinity107
cameta.com
jamaica25
hurricane249
florida48
grill211
jeffrey59
hospital70
hockey217
london4
nudism.com
fotos136
magazine108
marketing247
fitness19
evening53
hughes237
iluvsexygirls.com
james30
ground225
marathon209
hardware99
frame150
lewis122
little200
hardware99
garage32
gauge53
gazette55
hospital74
hotel162
jacket6
lyric80
lyric93
lanes18
interview198
laser44
funeral207
lyrics169
family132
estate33
foundation144
bioque.com
marco213
level117
lyrics40
kevin201
magic110
front192
kevin202
lodge230
india62
manga164
marathon208
westernranchsupply.com
express91
internet196
furniture228
magazine104
hitachi213
gallery249
filogix.com
little200
gymnastics73
jewelry96
bighillgmac.com
jesus89
linux183
hamiltonwatch.com
homes11
grace150
international179
first5
fortosage.net
illinois22
flowers72
resortquestisleofpalms.com
jersey79
international171
injury123
indianapolis82
gratis182
journal135
london2
hairstyles78
jaguar21
franchise158
market241
lyric91
auctioneerexpress.com
maker130
hentai178
international174
hotels172
lyrics20
manual197
jamaica24
internet196
group232
kennedy187
greensboro206
glasses122
guitar39
guest10
lyrics187
dcavm.org
holding230
lyrics158
foods80
knights238
guyzanddollz.com
funeral203
final229
lyrics70
floor39
jacob18
history206
highlandfest.info
jewelry97
formula115
funeral209
lyric92
jacket9
metapostmodernknitting.com
honda17
lincoln163
allcollegecourses.com
future241
management153
london243
homes10
lyric92
watonga.com
gallery7
house196
civilwardealers.com
lamps13
lyrics8
hotels177
lyrics245
lower29
honda34
justpuppies.com
island235
football90
malaysia142
family141
hotels173
resortstunica.com
furniture218
icons15
hotel126
flowers72
fujitsu199
knitting239
lyric64
london248
lyric99
luggage34
lotion7
lyrics201
jackson12
exercise76
kelly186
horse48
anglersnet.co.uk
lyric85
manual187
frame150
florida56
greek194
horse47
giant94